Difference between revisions of "Hanbury Brown cohort"

From Wolverhampton Light and Matter
Jump to: navigation, search
Line 3: Line 3:
 
This will be our first edition, no doubt an historical event for Physics at Wolverhampton. People who like to build and be part of something in the making from the very beginning, welcome!
 
This will be our first edition, no doubt an historical event for Physics at Wolverhampton. People who like to build and be part of something in the making from the very beginning, welcome!
  
[[File:hanbury-brown.jpg|link=|left]] The 2017-2018 cohort is named after [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Robert_Hanbury_Brown Robert Hanbury Brown], the British astronomer and physicist who proposed and experimentally confirmed the Hanbury Brown-Twiss effect, of correlations between photons. This great insight from an essentially unknown scientist (in fact, engineer) has been widely criticised by mainstream physicists, before its eventual recognition as a fundamental feature of the light-wave interpretation of fields, which gave birth to quantum optics.
+
[[File:hanbury-brown.jpg|link=|left]] The 2017-2018 cohort is named after [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Robert_Hanbury_Brown Robert Hanbury Brown], the British astronomer and physicist who proposed and experimentally confirmed the Hanbury Brown-Twiss effect, of correlations between photons. This great insight from an essentially unknown scientist (in fact, engineer) has been widely criticised by mainstream physicists when first announced, before its eventual recognition as a fundamental feature of the light-wave interpretation of nature, which gave birth to quantum optics. This is how he reminds the reaction from transposing to photons a demonstrated behaviour of light waves:
 +
<p>
 +
:''Now, to a surprising number of people, this idea [of photon correlations] seemed not only heretical but patently absurd and they told us so in person, by letter, in publications, and by actually doing experiments which claimed to show that we were wrong. At the most basic level they asked how, if photons are emitted at random in a thermal source, can they appear in pairs at two detectors? At a more sophisticated level the enraged physicist would brandish some sacred text, usually by Heitler, and point out that the number $n$ of quanta in a beam of radiation and its phase $\phi$ are represented by non-commuting operators and that our analysis was invalidated by the uncertainty relation $\delta n\times\delta\phi\approx1$.''
  
 
== Welcome week ==
 
== Welcome week ==
 +
 +
[[File:welcome-wondphys.jpg|link=]]
  
 
Click here for the [[:File:Welcome-week-PHYSICS-2017.pdf|welcome week program]].
 
Click here for the [[:File:Welcome-week-PHYSICS-2017.pdf|welcome week program]].

Revision as of 17:16, 18 September 2017

Physics class 2017-2018

This will be our first edition, no doubt an historical event for Physics at Wolverhampton. People who like to build and be part of something in the making from the very beginning, welcome!

Hanbury-brown.jpg

The 2017-2018 cohort is named after Robert Hanbury Brown, the British astronomer and physicist who proposed and experimentally confirmed the Hanbury Brown-Twiss effect, of correlations between photons. This great insight from an essentially unknown scientist (in fact, engineer) has been widely criticised by mainstream physicists when first announced, before its eventual recognition as a fundamental feature of the light-wave interpretation of nature, which gave birth to quantum optics. This is how he reminds the reaction from transposing to photons a demonstrated behaviour of light waves:

Now, to a surprising number of people, this idea [of photon correlations] seemed not only heretical but patently absurd and they told us so in person, by letter, in publications, and by actually doing experiments which claimed to show that we were wrong. At the most basic level they asked how, if photons are emitted at random in a thermal source, can they appear in pairs at two detectors? At a more sophisticated level the enraged physicist would brandish some sacred text, usually by Heitler, and point out that the number $n$ of quanta in a beam of radiation and its phase $\phi$ are represented by non-commuting operators and that our analysis was invalidated by the uncertainty relation $\delta n\times\delta\phi\approx1$.

Welcome week

Welcome-wondphys.jpg

Click here for the welcome week program.

Academic calendar

2017-18-Academic-Calendar-wlv.png

And these are the weekly-calendars for Physics: